Latest from Al Taghyeer
Al Taghyeer
14-07-2025
- Politics
- Al Taghyeer
Ugandan troops deployed following autopsy and burial of slain Sudanese refugee
The body of Sudanese refugee, Kabashi Idris Kafi, who was killed in a violent attack on refugee settlement, Saturday evening, was laid to rest in Kiryandongo camp, Bwera district, following submission of an official autopsy report signed by the UNHCR, the Ugandan police, and the Office of the Prime Minister. Kampala: Altaghyeer Sudanese community in Kiryandongo refugee camp in Uganda organized a funeral on Sunday evening for Kabashi Idris Kafi who was killed in a violent attack launched by the Nuer community of South Sudan on Saturday evening. The funeral was organised amid strict security measures and deployment of the Ugandan army around the refugee areas. More than 50 other Sudanese refugees were wounded in the attack which is the second wave of violence within the last few days. This camp hosts thousands of Sudanese who fled the ongoing war in their country. Meanwhile, the Ugandan authorities on Sunday held a meeting with the leaders of the Sudanese refugee community and leaders from the Nuer community resulting in a package of security and administrative measures to contain the situation. The meeting was chaired by the district governor, with the participation of the army commander, police and security leaders, and officials from the UNHCR, alongside representatives from organizations working in Uganda, and leaders from the Sudanese refugee community and the Nuer community. The meeting approved several measures, most notably imposing a dusk to dawn curfew, 7 pm to 7 am, and deploying units of the Ugandan army inside the settlements, head of the Sudanese refugee community, Hussein Hashem Timan, said in statements. Timan confirmed that the Nuer community leaders showed full cooperation with the authorities to arrest those involved in the attack, and acknowledged that the crisis resulted from disputes over agricultural land used by Sudanese refugees. Some Nuer community leaders noted that a segment of their youth felt uneasy about the privileges enjoyed by Sudanese inside the camp, especially regarding the agricultural land.
Al Taghyeer
14-07-2025
- Politics
- Al Taghyeer
Sudan's RSF commits horrific massacre in a North Kordofan area
Sources told Altaghyeer that the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have committed serious violations and a horrific massacre against civilians, Saturday, in the 'Shag al-Noom' area, North Kordofan state, western Sudan. Al-Obied: Altaghyeer At least 11 people, including 3 children, have been killed in a heinous crime committed by forces affiliated with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in the 'Shag al-Noom' area in North Kordofan state, central western Sudan, the Sudanese Doctors Network reported on Sunday. The attack also resulted in injury of 31 civilians including 9 women, some of them pregnant, the network said. The network described the killing as the worst brutal attack violating every humane norms and international charters. Sources told Altaghyeer that the RSF first launched an attack on the area with the aim of looting but they were forced to withdraw under the resistance from the residents. The forces returned again armed with heavier weapons which resulted in the killing of 11 people and the injury of a large number of others. The number of victims is likely much higher than announced with some residents putting the figures of the dead and wounded at 300 civilians as the RSF chased people escaping the scene to neighboring areas. Shag al-Noom lies 6 kilometers north of Bara, a city under the RSF control for now several months. Bara is about 317 kilometers west of the national capital Khartoum and 40 kilometers to the north east of al-Obeid, capital of North Kordofan State. The RSF has been trying, since eruption of its war with the Sudanese Armed Forces in April 2023, to control Kordofan region as an extension of the neighbouring Darfur region which is mostly under its control.
Al Taghyeer
09-07-2025
- Al Taghyeer
Sudan: Agricultural Research's Genes Bank ruined, 17,000 plant strains looted
According to the Director General of the Sudanese Agricultural Research Corporation efforts are currently underway to re-germinate some of the spoilt strains. Madani: Altaghyeer The Sudan's Rapid Support Forces have subjected the Agricultural Research Corporation to systematic destruction including the looting of the Agricultural Gene Bank and the theft of 33 refrigerators containing over 17,000 types of plant genetic strains, the acting Director of the Corporation revealed. Ahmed Hassan Abu Asara made the remarks during a joint meeting held on Tuesday at the Corporation's head office in Madani, al-Gezira State, and attended by representatives from the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the government of al-Gezira state. Abu Asara emphasized the vital importance of the gene bank in preserving genetic strains, noting that efforts are underway to re-germinate some of looted samples. 'There is an urgent need to provide refrigerators or cooling rooms to protect and ensure their survival', he said. The FAO Deputy Representative to Sudan, Adam Yao, explained that their visit aims to assess the current situation and develop phased intervention plans to rehabilitate the Corporation. He confirmed that there are donors willing to contribute to rebuilding the gene bank and improving strains. The Governor of the state, al-Tahir Ibrahim al-Khair, said his government is committed to installing a new cooling room for the gene bank, stressing that the Agricultural Research Corporation is a fundamental pillar and reference for the advancement of agriculture in Sudan.
Al Taghyeer
08-07-2025
- Business
- Al Taghyeer
Severe Threats Facing the Summer Agricultural Season in Sudan
Severe Threats Facing the Summer Agricultural Season in Sudan By: Omer Sidahmed The Current State of Agriculture in Sudan Amid a Prolonged War Agriculture has long been the backbone of Sudan's economy, employing over 60% of the labor force and contributing around 40% of GDP during times of stability. However, as Sudan enters the third year of a devastating war that broke out in April 2023, the country's agricultural infrastructure and rural economy are nearing total collapse—posing a grave threat of widespread food and humanitarian crises. The conflict has displaced more than 10 million people, a large portion of whom are farmers and agricultural workers, according to estimates by the UNHCR. This mass displacement has emptied the fields of their productive labor, particularly in key agricultural states such as Gezira, White Nile, Gedaref, Blue Nile, and the Greater Kordofan region—formerly the heartland of both irrigated and rainfed farming in Sudan. The 2025 summer farming season has begun under the worst financial conditions in decades. Agricultural financing from the formal banking sector has dropped to less than 5% of total credit—compared to approximately 15% prior to the war. The Agricultural Bank of Sudan has shut down operations in several states, including White Nile, due to liquidity shortages and operational collapse. Farmers in Gezira and Gedaref report that the bank is requiring the repayment of pre-war debts as a condition for new loans—forcing many to abandon farming altogether. The fragility of the banking system further exacerbates this crisis. An estimated 90% of Sudan's money supply circulates outside the formal banking sector, while the informal economy accounts for approximately 85% of overall economic activity, according to the World Bank and IMF. It is worth noting that the relationship between banks and the agricultural sector was already strained prior to the war. Agriculture was considered high-risk, subject to complex loan requirements, and typically received no more than 10% of bank lending portfolios at best. The war has only deepened these structural flaws—leaving farmers to face climate volatility, rising input costs, and collapsing local markets without institutional support. As a result, more than 20 million Sudanese now face acute food insecurity, according to the June 2025 report by the World Food Programme (WFP). The United Nations has ranked Sudan among the top four countries suffering from severe malnutrition globally. International reports, such as Chatham House's 2024 study, suggest that this agricultural collapse is not solely due to war—but also to the absence of a national strategy that treats agriculture as a sovereign priority rather than a marginal sector. The Collapse of the Banking System and the Decline of Agricultural Finance Since the outbreak of war in April 2023, Sudan's banking crisis has worsened dramatically. Khartoum, home to nearly 70% of Sudanese bank branches and headquarters, became a central battleground—leading to widespread destruction of banking infrastructure, branch closures, and the shutdown of clearing systems, which have since been relocated to the administrative capital. Despite this move, the banking sector has remained largely unable to resume full operations nationwide due to the continued conflict. Banks have virtually withdrawn from key agricultural zones—particularly in Darfur, Kordofan, Blue Nile, White Nile, and Gezira—resulting in a massive funding vacuum across productive sectors. Public trust in the banking system has plummeted amid the absence of basic financial services. However, the war is not the only culprit behind this collapse. It has also exposed deeper structural weaknesses that had been festering for years. Sudan ranks among the world's lowest in financial inclusion indicators. The banking sector suffers from eroded capital bases due to currency depreciation and the failure of the Central Bank of Sudan to enforce international standards such as Basel capital adequacy requirements or implement effective restructuring and governance programs. Banks and Agriculture: A Relationship of Caution, Not Investment The relationship between Sudanese banks and the agricultural sector reveals a glaring absence of a developmental vision. Both public and private banks continue to view agriculture as high-risk rather than as a strategic sector worthy of support and innovation. This is evident in the scarcity of seasonal credit, the imposition of complex collateral requirements, and the limited financial portfolios allocated to agriculture. In 2024, agricultural financing fell to less than 5% of total bank lending—down sharply from 15% before the war—deepening the crisis in the farming sector and worsening the country's food shortage. The Agricultural Bank: A Microcosm of State Failure in Supporting Agriculture The Agricultural Bank of Sudan was intended to be the state's primary financial arm in supporting farmers. In reality, it has become a paralyzed institution, reflecting the absence of political will to reform the sector. The bank suffers from: Severe liquidity shortages and an inability to direct resources into productive financing. Lack of transparency and recurring incidents of corruption in fund and inventory management. Political interference that has turned it into an administrative tool rather than a professional institution. No long-term institutional reform plans from the state. Farmers in Gezira and Gedaref have reported that the bank demanded repayment of old debts before issuing any new financing—leading to widespread abandonment of farming. Media reports have warned of critical delays in funding the summer farming season, threatening its viability. Some branches have witnessed public protests, and reports have emerged of fertilizer worth 11 billion Sudanese pounds going missing. Where Does the Problem Lie in Agricultural Financing? The root of the problem lies in the lack of an investment-oriented vision for agriculture. It is still treated as a risky sector rather than a productive, strategic one. The state has failed to develop a seasonal agricultural credit policy, and banks rely on short-term murabaha (cost-plus financing) structures that are poorly suited to agricultural cycles. Additionally, there is an absence of banking infrastructure in rural areas. Around 70% of bank branches are located in cities—or have become inoperative due to the war. Low financial inclusion and onerous collateral requirements pose serious barriers. Financial inclusion in Sudan is estimated at under 15%—one of the lowest rates globally—excluding most farmers from formal financial services. Perhaps the most striking symptom of dysfunction is the collapse of the Agricultural Bank itself, due to corruption, politicization, institutional failure, and poor resource allocation—all reflecting the state's lack of prioritization of this vital sector. Furthermore, there is a complete lack of integration between financing, production, and marketing—leaving farmers unprotected against market fluctuations and production risks. International Experiences in Agricultural Support Global experiences demonstrate that agriculture cannot thrive on market forces alone. Active state intervention is essential—as both a guarantor of food sovereignty and a facilitator of economic justice. United States: Despite its capitalist model, the U.S. Department of Agriculture offers extensive support programs for small and medium-scale farmers—including soft loans, storage facility financing, low-cost crop insurance, organic certification assistance, and direct-to-market programs such as 'Farm to School.' India: The Green Revolution was built on massive government support for fertilizers and seeds, guaranteed minimum crop prices, subsidized loans, and free extension services. Brazil: The PRONAF program successfully integrated family farming into the formal economy through subsidized loans, technical assistance, and climate risk coverage—doubling agricultural exports. Ethiopia: After the famine, Ethiopia rebuilt its rural sector through a national extension network, subsidized input distribution, and small-scale project financing—raising productivity by 7% annually between 2004 and 2014. Rwanda: The state made agriculture a pillar of post-war reconstruction—offering tax exemptions, subsidies covering up to 75% of input costs, and financing farmers through cooperative savings funds. Despite different contexts, these models share one common factor: proactive state involvement as a facilitator—not abandonment of agriculture. They show that when the farmer is seen as the cornerstone of national food security, supporting them becomes an investment in stability and growth—not a fiscal burden. Gold as a Sovereign Resource to Support Agriculture Sudan produces over 100 metric tons of gold annually (around 3.2 million ounces). At a price of $2,000 per ounce, this could yield up to $6.4 billion annually. However, at least 70% of this gold is smuggled—resulting in the loss of more than $4 billion in potential national revenue each year. If just 30–40% of these revenues were allocated to agriculture—via the creation of a sovereign fund dedicated to the sector—it could transform Sudan's economic landscape and help restore food production capacity. Conclusion What threatens Sudanese agriculture is not just war—but the absence of a developmental vision, the collapse of the banking system, and the farmer's exclusion from financing and institutional support. Genuine economic recovery cannot be achieved without addressing these structural failures and channeling sovereign resources—such as gold—toward production, not war. July 2025
Al Taghyeer
29-06-2025
- Politics
- Al Taghyeer
US says denial of humanitarian assistance in Sudan is used as a war tactic
The United States proposes three actions for facilitating aid delivery in Sudan; removal of bureaucratic impediments, opening of all border crossings into Sudan for humanitarian purposes and issuance of visas for humanitarian workers. Altaghyeer: Agencies The United States has accused parties to the conflict in Sudan of using the denial of humanitarian assistance as a tactic of war by manipulating humanitarian operations to achieve military and intelligence objectives. 'The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and other armed actors continue to impede humanitarian access, causing famine, immense loss of life, and wasted resources', said acting U.S. Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Dorothy Shea, before a panel briefing at the Security Council on Friday. Shea stressed that the Sudan conflict continues to be the world's largest humanitarian crisis – a crisis completely man-made. The United States proposes three actions for the parties to implement their obligations, she said, explaining that these steps include the need to remove bureaucratic impediments that delay the dispatch of supplies and personnel, 'all parties should respond within 72 hours from the notification of humanitarian implementor of intended use, contents, and destination of humanitarian assistance; otherwise, aid should be allowed to move forward.' The second action the parties must open all border crossings into Sudan before humanitarian purposes. The third, visas and permits must be issued for humanitarian workers throughout Sudan within one week of application. Shea said if Sudan is unwilling to issue visas and permits, the UN and other international organizations should seek to base their response to the conflict elsewhere in the region. She affirmed that her country will hold groups accountable for blocking aide delivery. 'We will consider the readiness of parties to facilitate humanitarian access and enable humanitarian delivery when making decisions about funding, programming, and partnerships on broader initiatives.'
